Wow. To read the technology news the last week or two you would think that Facebook had all but shut down those poor saps over at Google. Site after site is "reporting" that Facebook’s new universal Like Button is going to replace Google’s search engine rankings pages, aka SERPs, with a much better Internet search function based on its millions of users clicking LIKE on webpages all over the world.
(See! What did I tell you! That’s a LIKE button right there on this very webpage.)
This super-powerful Facebook weapon, called F8, is a Google killer and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it. If you are not a Facebook user, you must sign up NOW. If you are a website owner, webmaster, content publisher, Internet marketer, writing to make money online, an online business marketing expert, or even if you are the guy who pumps the stuff out of the bottom of Porta-Potties, you must start using Facebook now! You must add Facebook LIKE buttons to every website, webpage, mobile phone, iPad, iPhone, iStore, iFacebook — I forgot where I was going with this sentence, because I just can’t stop thinking about the awesome new power of Facebook!
Whew!
Sarcasm can be hard to pull off in writing, even for a professional writer. How did I do?
I might be exaggerating a little bit, but only a little bit.
You get the idea.
And, that’s just the "responsible" journalism subset of websites. You can about guess what this all sounds like out in the rabid echo chamber of social media, or social marketing, or Web 2.0, or whatever people are calling it these days.
If all of this sounds just a little too over-hyped, then you just don’t understand what is going on!
Right?
Wrong.
Facebook Like Button Is No Google Killer
Don’t get me wrong, Facebook’s new F8 initiative could potentially be pretty great. It might even grow into a useful tool, but that is a long way from being anything more than a blip on the technology radar. The problem, of course, is that the people writing about the big new development from the Facebook developer conference are people who would go to, or read about, a developer conference. This is not a cross-section of middle America. These are techies.
Read my parenting skills tips or my credit card rewards reviews.
Again, don’t misunderstand. I am a techie. I spent years as a high-end computer systems consultant. Although I bailed on the tech industry right before the Internet Bubble popped and the computer industry melted down, I have never given up those techie roots. Thanks to my time as a computer consultant working at numerous companies from senior management down to local desktop support, I have a lot of experience with Information Technology and the issues and problems IT Departments and IT managers face. I leveraged my background to become a freelance technology writer and built that into a pretty nice little freelance writing business. — In all fairness, my expertise after my computer days came in personal finance where I was a Certified Financial Planner. I leveraged that into becoming a freelance financial writer, and the two combined were what gave me enough clients and income to go from start-up entrepreneur to building my own small business.
However, these days I interact with a wider circle of people both professionally and personally, thanks in part to Facebook. Like many people, a few years ago I had no interest in being on Facebook, in large part because I didn’t really know anyone else who was on Facebook. More specifically, I thought I didn’t know anyone else on Facebook. The ONLY reason I even signed up was that an increasing number of freelance writing gigs started asking for people who were "experienced with social media," or even "experts in social marketing." It’s hard to say that you are an expert in social websites if you don’t have an account on any of them.
With a Top 10 Social Websites You MUST Have a Presence On from some magazine, I proceeded to sign up for six social networking websites. (The other four were so obviously not germane to anything even remotely business related that I didn’t bother.) One of those sites was Facebook. I think three of the others no longer exist, or if they do, are most certainly not anything that you MUST be a part of anymore.
I filled out the little profile thing, plugged my freelance writing website (www.arcticllama.com) as much as possible and posted a handful of things. It might have ended there, except for one little thing. A former high school classmate who still consider a friend, but who I hadn’t talked to in years, sent me a friend request. Soon, I was linked to a dozen or so high school classmates. Then, my sister sent me a friend request and mentioned that I should do the same for a cousin who was living abroad, and so on and so on. Eventually most of my family was on Facebook and an increasing number of my friends and former colleagues.
Facebook Weakens Privacy Then Asks Users To "Like" Everywhere They Go
Which brings me to exactly why the Facebook LIKE button will not replace Google or even threaten to cast a the tiniest shadow over Google and its massive search engine business.
There is no way that I am ever going to LIKE certain things lest my friends, family, and co-workers see them.
Already, I have taken Facebook’s privacy tools to their limits. I have my "friends" organized in lists and with every single post, I carefully select which list gets to see that status update, MANUALLY.
I have to. It is not an option.
I have some friends and relatives who have strong religious beliefs. I have other friends and family members who are very liberal. I have clients who are very traditional (I have to wear a suit and tie when I go onsite) and I have clients who are more freewheeling than my crazy friends (I might have to go onsite naked … if it’s Friday).Whatever I do, I need to ensure that it does not jeopardize relationships that I have spent years, or in some cases, a lifetime, cultivating just so that I "Like" a webpage or website.
There are LOTS of people using Facebook who are in a similar situation. And, with Facebook weakening its privacy standards at every opportunity, it only gets harder to maintain the proper boundaries. Facebook has already made it so that users cannot hide their friends list. That means that some users must choose between keeping an ex-girlfriend as a friend or risk losing their current girlfriend. That also goes for former employers, current employers, former and current bosses, former and current clients, and so on. And that is just one tiny thing.
Facebook has offered no easy to use controls for its users to keep their LIKES separated based on friend lists for example. If I "like" a Save the Baby Seals page will a client that sells clubs stop using my services? Or, will they insist that I "like" a How To Club Protestors site? (I jest, but you get the point.) In other words, users will only be able to recommend websites that they know are inoffensive across their entire friends list. Either that, or they will have to violate Facebook’s Terms of Service and sign up for multiple accounts.
In the end, Facebook has already shot itself in the foot with this current initiative. Far from threatening Google, Facebook’s F8 universal LIKE button is already doomed to fail.
After a handful of Likes cause ripples by being sent back to Facebook profiles, people will stop using the button and go back to using similar services that they can keep separated like Delicious, Digg, or Yahoo Buzz, or whatever. Then, will come the news stories like the ones you see now about employers firing someone, or not hiring them in the first place, because of what they "liked" or even because of what they had not "liked." Usage of the like Facebook function will dwindle until it becomes nothing more than a bunch of techies creating a virtual mirror of the funny news, political wailing, and Apple stories that dominate Digg.
Of course, by then, all of those people writing about Facebook’s New Google Killer App will be writing about the next must use Internet dominating service or feature. Just like they were all writing about Twitter two years ago.
You thought we forgot, didn’t you?
Will You Use Facebook Like Without Being Able to Control It?
*********************************************************************************
Since you can’t separate LIKES using any built-in Facebook privacy features, how will you handle the new F8 Universal Web-Wide Like Button? Will you ignore it or only Like certain kinds of websites?
*********************************************************************************
P.S. If you have any examples of BEFORE / AFTER type news stories from major technology pundits who were writing about the domination of Twitter within the last two years who are now writing about the domination of Facebook, I would love to hear about them. Leave them in the comment below and I’ll even DoFollow your comment link back to your LEGITIMATE website.
(Don’t bother if its a "landing page" for some Internet marketing affiliate thing or whatever. I will only Do Follow links to real content, no cloaked links, no landing pages, no tricks. If you have a legitimate sales ad or opportunity on a webpage containing useful information, that is fine.)
Since it is Microsoft, and I’m sure they already have a lawyer approved press statement justifying their actions, no one will call it what it is, but Microsoft has written and launched a trojan (A program that appears legitimate, but performs some illicit activity when it is run…Trojans often sneak in attached to a free game or other utility.) that installs software on the user’s computer without the user being told or having the opportunity to not install the software. (Actually, I’m sure that there is something buried in the bajillion page user agreement that I am laughably supposed to read before installing software.)
To skip ahead, search enhancement pack remove seaport.exe
The trojan program from Microsoft is the Windows Live software bundle. Installing any one of the applications from the bundle will result in an extra service being secretly installed on the user’s computer. The service, called SeaPort, is installed as an Automatic service and thus runs on startup each and every time the user boots their computer regardless of whether or not they are running the software that was ethically installed on their computer by request.
Searches done on both Google and Microsoft’s own Live search engine show no mention whatsoever of Seaport on Microsoft’s website except in a user community where another bewildered user asks, “What is Seaport and should I be worried?” Screenshots of the Seaport-less searches done on January 28, 2009 are here:
…..
…. 
As confused users arrive here in droves by asking seaport.exe what is (grammar isn’t a strong suit of the flummoxed searcher) one can only wonder how many millions of other users haven’t even noticed.
Enough is Enough
I have officially had it with software companies (and Microsoft is not the only one) installing any and all of their garbage on my computer whenever they feel like it because they think it will improve the experience for using software that I may or may not ever use!
I am now looking into starting a non-profit organization that monitors, publicizes, and when necessary pursues other actions against software companies for this and other unethical installation practices. If you want to be kept in the loop as it gets started up, grab the RSS Feed or shoot an email to wghubris@besthubris.com asking to be added to the email list. (I not only do not spam or sell your email address, I won’t even email for any reason other than this topic unless you state otherwise.)
Microsoft has released Office 2010 to manufacturers. I’ve been using 2010 exclusively for awhile now in my freelance writing business. In particular Office OneNote 2010 offers a great organization and clipping tool for freelance writers. For those of you who are not real familiar with how Microsoft releases software upgrades and new versions of products, here is a quick overview.
Want to know how to delete a section group in OneNote 2010?
First, Microsoft codes the product. When it has most of the features and it works pretty well in the test environment, the company releases a technical preview, which used to be called an beta release. This used to only go to select Microsoft partners who has specifically signed up to participate in test Microsoft software. But, the public was invited to download and use Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview off of the Microsoft website.
The new strategy of releasing beta or test software to the public has proven highly successful for Microsoft. Unlike the crash and burn release that made everyone hate Windows Vista, Windows 7 was released to surprisingly few problems and generally positive press, in part due to the extensive testing that Microsoft did by allowing the public to download, install, use, and complain about Windows 7 test versions. It’s no surprise that the boys in Redmond went back to the well for Office 2010, allowing a very public, very functional test release of the Microsoft Office 2010 Suite upgrade to be downloaded by anyone.
The company then continues to update and fix the software until it is satisfied with the result (or needs to ship in order to satisfy other strategic objectives). Once that happens, the company “freezes” the code and no more additional development is allowed on the product, although bug fixes can still take place. This is often referred to as the “Gold” code or gold version. This is the last test version of the product ever produced.
Once the code has been frozen, programmers fix any confirmed bugs. When that is complete, the company presses DVD media or CDs and ships those (or allows electronic transfer of the product installs) to the companies that actually make and sell computers so that they can start designing their own installations of the product to be used on upcoming computer sales. At this point in time, the “real” product exists and customers can get it (legally) by purchasing a computer that comes with a pre-install of Office 2010.
Finally, the company settles on marketing materials, logos, box art, DVD art, and so on and puts together a retail package that can be put on the shelves at Best Buy or Wal-mart, or whatever. This is planned for Summer 2010.
In the meantime, if you know how to rock the Bittorrent, you can probably get your hands on a copy if you really must. Otherwise, the last updated preview version you downloaded should work just find until the product is released for shipping.
By the way, Office 2010 is a really great product. If you are upgrading from 2007, there isn’t as much that is immediately noticeable as if you are upgrading from 2003 or earlier, but it is still worth it. Check out my review of the Office 2010 on Windows 7 review of the technical preview edition as an overview, and coming soon, my reviews of Word 2010, Excel 2010, and more.