WGHubris on October 5th, 2010

Usually, private industry has figured out how they are going to get around new government rules and safety programs before they ever come out. The credit card industry was already inventing new credit card fees and raising old fees and charges before the new credit card laws took effect. The same thing happens in almost all industries.

It isn’t really the government’s fault. A political system that demands transparency and open rules and regulation creation also gives company’s a sneak-peak at any up coming changes.

However, it seems that there is at least one area that a government safety agency has managed to close the "loopholes" used by manufacturers in the past to conceal any issues with their product.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration or NHTSA announced that they will begin including an overall score in the new enhanced 5-Star Safety Ratings System for new vehicles. This stops company’s from the using the despicable trick of advertising a 5-Start crash rating when what they often really mean is that their car achieved a 5-start rating in one of three areas. The car may have scored 4-Stars or less in the other 3 areas. The net effect is that rather than make their cars safer, many manufacturers build what they were going to build anyway and then deceive the public with fine-print and legal disclosures buried ten pages deep in a document that no one ever reads.

That will be harder to pull off starting today. The new Overall Vehicle Score will be the one that shows up in bold, black letters on all window stickers for new cars (once they get tested) instead of the salesperson pointing out the rating that they want you to see.

In addition, the new ratings standards are higher. After all after 20 years one would HOPE that cars are safer today when the previous crash test ratings standards were put in place. In other words, what was considered very good safety, worthy of a 5-star crash test rating, is no longer good enough to be worthy of 5-star government crash rating in 2011.

Even better, the new overall rating is, in part, based upon how the vehicle compares to other vehicles for safety. In other words, it is no longer good enough to just meet the criteria to call your vehicle 5-Start Safety worthy, it has to be one of the top-tier of safe cars in its class.

Manufacturers and their political allies are always saying that the public should decide what the want for car safety instead of car makers being forced into safety features that add cost to the car and that, according to them, car buyers don’t want. It is obvious that they do not actually believe that, since they go out of their way to conceal how safe the cars they make actually are so that any sub-standard safety features or missing safety improvements do not cost them sales.

With this new rating system, the government has ensured that customers can now legitimately vote with their wallets by buying or not buying cars that are safer, because for the first time, the average customer will be able to tell at a glance if they really are buying a safer car or not. No longer will being an "informed customer" in the area of car safety mean understanding how every safety feature works and how important or cost effective that item is.

It will be interesting to see as the new system comes fully online and gets more and more cars rated how the sales figures of automobiles are affected when customers get clear, up-front, easy to understand data about car safety before they buy. If sales of safer cars start greatly outpacing those of less safe cars, this may be the start of the next revolution of innovation in car design and manufacturing.

Check out the government’s car safety website at www.safercar.gov to see current crash test ratings and details of the cars reviewed and the new standards.

Tags: , , , ,

WGHubris on September 29th, 2010

Yesterday, the personal finance blog Finance Gourmet speculated on how overvalued Facebook might be right now, and more specifically, if any of the company valuations being thrown around by financial analysts and private share exchanges are anything more than wild (optimistic) guesses.

I had a different thought today as I went through my usual social media routine. As one of Facebook’s 500 million users, I became a “Fan” of a bunch of things and then when Facebook changed the rules, I started to “LIKE” a bunch of things too. However, whenever one of those things that I am a fan of posts something lame or posts too often, I click the HIDE button and they disappear forever from my Facebook News Feed.

Facebook Fans Hide Updates

Here is the issue. I am still a fan of all of those things, but I never see a single word from them, nor do I interact with them again in anyway. The question is, how many “fans” out there do the same thing on a regular basis?

The latest on Citibank ThankYou rewards is on FinanceGourmet.

In other words, if you have 50,000 fans is that worth anything? How many of those 50K fans have hidden you? How many are ignoring everything you post or using one of the friends lists to screen out your status updates?

Has Facebook made its service less valuable by making it less apparent how well any Facebook business, social group, interest, or marketing attempt is working?

Just because you have 30,000 fans, doesn’t mean that you have 30,000 users getting your posts.

Or, am I just being overly analytical?

These aren’t meaningless questions. They go right to the heart of the business strategy value of using Facebook as a way to stay in touch. Contrast this to Twitter, where followers are always recieving every one of your tweets. (Whether or not they are reading them or paying any attention is another matter.)

Tags: , , , , , ,

WGHubris on September 29th, 2010

Although I am, among other things, a freelance technology writer today, I was once a Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, aka MCSE and a pretty high-level systems administrator. As such, computers have always been pretty easy for me. For most software, I don’t read the instruction manual or any of the program’s help files. If I can’t figure it out, it probably isn’t worth figuring out.

At least that has been my thought regarding new software programs, operating system upgrades, and even most online services or web-based programs that have come across my radar in past decade or so. This has served me pretty well even though I long ago left the computer industry to spend some time (maybe too much time) in the financial industry where I was a Certified Financial Planner — which comes in handy when I put on my freelance financial writer hat.

Lately, however, some programs have begun to elude me and my intuitive grasp. A large part of that comes from how the computing paradigm is changing from Windows-based programs, with “versions” for other platforms, and the increasing complexity possible with online services or cloud-based programs. I have reluctantly had to hit the books on some programs.

That being said, I usually get the gist of most new software and computer programs pretty quickly. While I may no longer be able to anticipate their functionality on a consistent basis, I am seldom left scratching my head and wondering where to even start.

rapidshare-updates-service-screenshotAnd this brings me to Rapid Share. For those of you who are not familiar with RapidShare, it is one of the first, and biggest, of the online file storage and sharing websites. Unlike online storage products primarily designed for you to store your own files to be retrieved primarily by you and your friends and family, RapidShare is setup to allow you to store files and then let anyone download them. No login or permission is needed (if you choose to store your files in that way). All that someone needs to get your files is to know what the address to them is, which is often provided by a link on a website or in a forum.

As you might expect, this method of distribution can, and is, used to enable illegal file sharing. However, RapidShare avoids any shutdown threat by quickly and efficiently removing any file reported as a copyright violation almost immediately. As such, some pirates and hackers have moved on to greener pastures.

Paying for RapidShare Premium Account or RapidShare Pro

If this sound like the kind of thing that just about anyone can do, you are not wrong. RapidShare has flourished by being one of the first movers in this space. Once someone learns to use RapidShare as their go-to file sharing service, they stick with it, because not only is RapidShare easy to copy, there isn’t really anything to be added or improved either. Thus, whenever someone finds a new file hosting service, there really isn’t any reason to switch, so they don’t.

The basic model of all file host sharing services is that you allow users to download files for free. Otherwise, it makes it not worth the uploader using the service because not everyone they want to share the file with is going to pay for the service. However, in order to make money, the file hosting service restricts how many files you can download or how much traffic you can use before you have to wait for some time period. Furthermore, you have to use the “slow” download instead of downloading as fast as your computer can suck down data.

For most casual users this is acceptable because they only download one or two files anyway, and the difference between getting the file in three minutes and downloading the file in eight minutes is moot. Obviously, for users downloading a lot more files, or bigger files, this won’t do. To get around the restrictions, they pay for a “premium account” or a “pro account.”

I’ve been paying for a RapidShare Premium account for a long time, mostly out of habit. The JDownloader utility largely makes paying for premium accounts a waste, but there are just enough times when I need the extra speed and ability offered by a Premium Rapidshare account that I keep renewing.

One cool thing is that you get points when people download your files and every so often, I earn enough RapidShare points to get a free RapidShare premium account for a month or two.

Lately, however, the service has changed how it looks and how it works. They made some changes a while back that were very unpopular with most users of the service. The company backtracked and fixed whatever those issues were before I even became aware of them. I guess I wasn’t a power enough user to notice. Recently, instead of my RapidShare files just downloading automatically once I was logged in and a cookie was set on my computer, I started having to pick “Fast Download” every time I downloaded a file even though I was logged in. Apparently, this was a new setting that was part of some other upgrade or service update.

I don’t even recognize the RapidShare website anymore. I did find my settings and change it to stop displaying the RapidShare screen every time I tried to download a file. This seems pretty suspect. After all, what possible reason could ANY paid user have for selecting whether to use fast or slow downloads? Wouldn’t you always want to choose fast?

While changing the download setting, I noticed two others. These settings really rub me the wrong way. They are set to automatically renew your RapidShare Pro account and to buy more traffic when you run out. I HATE THAT!

I think it is fine to offer, but it should ALWAYS be an OPT-IN thing, not an opt out. Crap like that is why I use temporary disposable credit card numbers that are offered on some of the best credit cards like my Citibank rewards Elite Mastercard that I have. I stopped bothering to generate a temp number for RapidShare because it was always on the up and up. That will be changing.

Even more infuriating, in order to change those settings to “do not charge me whenever you feel like it, I’ll decide if the service you provide is worth sending you more money or not, thank you”, I had to first “Unlock” my account. The Lock feature of RapidShare is actually a good security move. It keeps people from messing with your account even if they manage to get your username and password as is prone to happen by phishing scams. But, I find it VERY hard to believe that anyone who compromises my account will turn off my auto-renewal feature. What would the motive be? The might want to turn it ON so that they can keep using my account, but I doubt they would try and turn it off.

Finally, I guess I need to go read the manual or RapidShare FAQ, or something, because I really do not understand what is going on any more. I paid for a Pro account, or so I thought. Now, it looks like I am actually paying for Rapids which are points that I can use for a Pro account. Seems like an extra step, but if it is a transparent one, then who cares. On the other hand, maybe things don’t work the way they used to and I won’t like the new way.

Also, I can’t help but wonder what the auto-buy more traffic option was about? I’m pretty sure my old RapidShare Premium account had no traffic limits, which was kind of the point of the premium account. Now, it looks like that might not be the case and I need to start budgeting my traffic.

Actually, if that is the case, it looks like I’ll need to buy a Hotfile or Fileshare premium account instead, because I’m pretty sure that they haven’t changed the rules on their paying customers.

Grandfathering For Existing Customers

A very important consideration for companies to look into is the viability of grandfathering your existing users under the old rules of your service. Some times, this business strategy is the only way to keep a loyal customer base from abandoning your product in droves.

As I pointed out above, there are many competitors to RapidShare that are just as fast, just as stable, and just as cheap. There is little to keep a user from jumping ship at anytime. However, an established enterprise like RapidShare has a certain number of customers on auto-pilot. Like me — until today — these customers are likely to keep renewing and keep paying without comparison shopping with your competition. However, that only stays true if you don’t change too much on them. Draw too much attention to yourself with updates, features, and limits that weren’t there before and your loyal customers will suddenly wonder if they are not so much loyal, as dupes who were asleep at the switch.

When that happens, you better have the best service out there, because you better believe that they will go looking to find out, and what they will be looking for is not the newest, the latest, and the greatest, but rather what they had before.

Better make sure no one else is offering that before you pull the plug.

Tags: , , , , , ,

WGHubris on September 28th, 2010

What was once a nuisance on only one of my computers and on only one of my browsers appears to be spreading to my other systems and web browsers.

I’ve been getting an error about how a redirection will never complete on my Google Chrome browser on my main desktop PC for a couple of months now. I’ve mostly ignored it since it was working just fine on my laptop and netbook computers both with Google Chrome and Firefox. (I don’t really use Internet Explorer much any more.) Now, it seems to be happening everywhere.

After typing in www.google.com/webmasters (or selecting a link or bookmark for the same), I click on the button to Log into to Google Webmaster tools, but that is where it ends. This is the error I get while using Firefox.

google-webmasters-error-redirect-never-resolve

Yes, I have cookies enabled, AdBlocker turned off (or in the case of Google Chrome, not installed), and NoScript set to allow all google.com JavaScripts.

Internet Explorer 9 beta fails too, although with an even less helpful error message.

Check out my latest personal finance article about Citibank rewards ThankYou network reward program.

A quick Google (ironically) search mentions clearing out the browser cookies, which I have tried to no avail.

Basically, right now, I can’t access Google Webmaster tools on my desktop PC. I get the feeling it is only a matter of time until it affects all of my computer systems. The only change recently is that I have started using the LastPass plugin. That might be the culprit. I say that because unlike most Firefox extensions, LastPass does work across multiple browser platforms including Internet Explorer and Chrome. I guess I’ll try to disable it and see if that gets me anywhere. If not, I’ll live for now, but things will be getting less pretty as time goes on.

Hopefully someone will figure this out and get their USEFUL response and solution ranked highly enough in Google’s new Instant Search functionality for me to be able to find it.

Rant over.

Carry on.

Update: The problem with logging into Google website has something to do with the LastPass password management tool. After setting all google.com to NEVER for autofill or autologin, the issue went away. Now, if I get time, I can look into WHY that creates a problem with logging into Google websites.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

WGHubris on September 23rd, 2010

Google has done everyone a big favor with its Google Chrome web browser. Like all other major web browsers, Chrome allows users to install extensions which allow for additional or customized functionality to be added to individual software installations. In this way, every user can get the features and functions that they need and want from their web browser without the original developer having to build, test, and install every one of those features into the main browser software installation package. In this world of over-bloated software (I’m looking at you Adobe), extensions have the added benefit of providing what some users want, while not forcing other users to have the code installed but never used.

Unfortunately, installing extensions is a lot like installing other software or utilities on your computer. By installing them, you are giving the software access and permissions to do things with your data. That means that it is very important to only install software or extensions from developers you trust. The catch is that it is not always easy to know for sure that the extension you are installing is from a trusted developer, especially if you are trying to install a Chrome version of an extension you already know and trust from another browser like Firefox, because there is nothing to keep an unscrupulous developer from taking the same name.

Google verifies extensions offered in its Extensions Gallery for Chrome by telling you what domain name or web address the developer has. If you like the Xmarks extension on Firefox and you know that extension comes from a developer at Xmarks.com, all you need to do to trust the Xmarks extension from Google’s Chrome Extension Gallery is look for the Google verification that the extension you are looking at has been verified as from xmarks.com.

Stay safe, and happy web surfing.

WGHubris on September 22nd, 2010

If you are a fan of the Google WonderWheel tool, either for finding related searches that might better fit what you are looking for, or for checking to see if there are other keywords or search phrases that you should be including in content you publish to the web, you may have notices that the Google Wonder Wheel is gone from the sidebar.

As a result of the rollout of Instant Search, Google decided that nobody needed the WonderWheel anymore (or it just didn’t want them using it anymore) and removed it from the More Tools section on the sidebar that shows up on the left side of the screen during web searches. Fortunately, you can get the WonderWheel back by changing some Google settings, but it isn’t pretty.

Basically, you have to change one of your search settings. These are the same settings where you can turn on and off the adult content filter and change your search results to 20 per screen instead of 10, and so on. There is new setting in there for Instant Search. Select Do Not Use Instant Search and your Google search interface goes back to the way it was before the rollout of the the new instantly changing search screen, including having the WonderWheel.

The bad news is that no one knows how long going back to the old version of Google search will be an option for users, but for now, at least, you can revert to the original setup and use WonderWheel. In doing so, you lose access to the very useful update of Instant Search. To get around this, either use one of the web browser private browsing modes and change the setting in there only when you need to use Wonder Wheel, or setup a different profile that has WonderWheel on but Instant Search off, and vice versa so that you can easily switch between.

Or, you can do like I do. Since I rarely use Internet Explorer (usually only to go to microsoft.com) I have changed the Google Instant Search setting OFF in my IE browser and left it on in my real web browsers so that whenever I need wonder-wheel, I just fire up Internet Explorer and do my searches inside there.

Have a good one.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

WGHubris on September 21st, 2010

I am a big fan of Woot. Like many others, I like their deal-of-the-day and follow it on a pretty regular basis.

In case you aren’t familiar with it, Woot.net offers one “deal” every day. When that deal is sold out, it is all gone and you can’t get anymore. No new deal takes its place until the next day, when there is once again a new deal for the day. Sometimes the deals are amazing, and sometimes the deals are pretty much the same kind of price you would be able to get anywhere if you just looked around a little bit.

One thing that Woot does on a fairly regular basis is offer refurbished or reconditioned products. A refurbished item is one that has gone from being new, to getting back into the manufacturer’s hands where it is fixed or looked over, and then sold again. Since the device technically is not new, it is labeled as refurbished.

Theoretically, a refurbished item has been restore to “like new” condition, but this is an obvious falsehood since no manufacturer offers the full “like new” warranty on their refurbished products. They know as well as you do that a product that had to be fixed is more likely to have other problems than one that was fine right out of the box the first time. So, you get either no warranty at all, or a much shorter one than normal.

Depending upon what you are buying and how likely it is to break, buying refurbished can be a good way to get a great deal by paying much less than a new product costs for one that is likely just as good. On the other hand, some products aren’t very robust in the first place and paying less for one with a virtually useless warranty is not a good idea. Saving money requires only buying the right kinds of things when they are refurbished. The catch is that it is not always easy to tell which is which.

That brings us to the Refurbished iRobot Roomba. Frequent users of Woot like to joke about how often reconditioned Roobmas show up on the website. It seems that the iRobot Roomba 530 Robotic Vacuum with Virtual Wall seems to show up the most often. When refurbished Roombas show up in a Woot-Off, they bring the special multi-deal day auctions to a screeching halt while it takes hours to sell out.

In fact, I would guess that Woot has to hold off the iRobot folks lest their products fill the site several days each week.

Which begs the question, is buying a refurbished cheap irobot roomba a good idea? Or, are refurbished Roombas a scam?

Unfortunately, the answer is that iRobot Roombas are great little carpet sweeper vacuums when they work properly. However, they are incredibly fragile. The problem is that doing what the Roobma does actually requires more expensive hardware, but people won’t pay more for robot vacuums. That means that iRobot has to try and make do with the fastest manufacturing processes and the cheapest parts.

Frankly, the company has done an admirable job in being able to make a robotic vacuum with all of the features people want at a price they are willing to pay. But, in the end, Roombas are very temperamental and prone to breaking both quickly and often. The company stands behind its products with a one-year manufacturer warranty, which is good. However, since they break a lot, the company ends up with TONS of Roombas that it fixes and then has to resell as reconditioned Roombas or refurbished Roombas.

  • If you want to see for yourself, check any of the Roomba forums and you’ll see many Roobma problems that are so common they have names. Do a search for roomba circle dance, roomba battery problem, and roobma cliff sensors, for several examples. (Hint: Ignore all results from ehow.com or fixya.com as they are usually worthless.)
  • For an even more useful search include either roomba 4xxx or roomba 5xxx or even roomba 3xxx in your search. This is how Roobma owners and techies refer to the specific problems that plague each series of Roomba robotic vacuums. (The xxx is a place holder. Most problems that happen to any of the 4000 series Roombas happens to all of them whether they are Roomba 4100 Red, Roobma 4105 Sage, or Roomba 4210 Discovery.)

Refurbished Roombas are sold with only a 90-day warranty. Basically, the company washes its hands of the ones that were broken by getting them working and shipping them back out with a short warranty that ensures they will likely not have to deal with that particular unit again, which is good, since plenty of new ones are headed back into the factory at any time. For consumers however, it is not so good. If there was a weak solder or connection on one part that is fixed, but the other another has not broken YET, it might also have a weak connection and will break soon, although probably after 90 days.

The question is whether or not this is a self-defeating strategy for iRobot and its attempts to build a market in robotic vacuums. While it may be true that there is no wiggle room in increasing the costs associated with making Roombas, reselling units that are more likely to have trouble than brand new units could very well be creating a population of Roomba owners who will

  1. Never buy another Roomba again because the refurbished one they bought broke so quickly
  2. Will recommend to friends and neighbors not to buy Roombas because they break too easily
  3. Will be willing to buy a robot vacuum from a competitor when technology allows better, longer-lasting, roomba-type vacuums to be built for lower costs
  4. And, of course, will tell friends to buy the other brand because it doesn’t break right away like Roombas do

As corporate strategies go, the one iRobot seems to be pursuing is one destined to fail. There are only so many consumers willing to try a robotic vacuum in the first place. Each one of them that is alienated by a faulty refurbished Roomba reduces that pool by one more. While Roomba is the only game in town today, people tend to have long memories of being burned, especially on higher priced items like the iRobot Roombas. That means that when they are easier to develop and sell than they are now, there are going to be plenty of waiting customers for new competitors.

Although it might cost Roomba more on the bottom line in the short-term, the company would be better served for the long-term by offering a full one-year warranty on its refurbished Roombas, just like it does on new ones. Doing so might even allow for them to be sold a higher price than they are now. More importantly, doing so would stop the creation of an army of Roobma haters who think that Roobmas are junk and buying one is just a scam. Perhaps, most useful of all, as refurbished Roombas came back in for service the company could learn what it is that goes wrong most often the second time around and perhaps preemptively “fix” the potential problems on every refurbished Roomba before it goes out the door, resulting in fewer warranty service requests on refurbished Roombas, thus negating the additional expense of servicing them for a longer time.

Of course, that only works if the company is not fully aware that all Roombas are just ticking time-bombs that the company needs to ship and get off of the service life-cycle as quickly as possible to avoid bankruptcy. In which case, there really is no valid strategy, other than to hope that people never wise up.

The author has owned two Roomba vacuums, a Roomba 4100 Red, which worked perfectly for almost three years before the battery died, and a refurbished Roomba 530 which developed the common Roobma problem where when turned on it keeps trying to backup because it thinks its bump sensor has been activated. The author still owns both Roomba, although both gather dust in the corner of the basement because replacing the Roomba Red battery is too expensive, and fixing the 530 Roomba requires near complete disassembly or paying as much as the purchase price to have it fixed. When asked, the author tells people, “When they work, they are pretty great, but they seem to break very easily, so it might not last very long.”

I’ve never seen anyone buy one after I tell them that, and I am not an iRobot Roomba hater. I just can’t justify buying a new one until I start hearing that they are much more reliable.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,